Mike L Anderson Mike L Anderson 2 141 2009-11-02T16:15:00Z 2009-11-02T16:15:00Z 7 3119 14972 394 106 21834 9. 2720 Lotto nonsense? By Mike L Anderson I think it was at a church fete. I was around 12 years old. The game was darts. The board had red, green and white stripes. You could double your money if you landed on the correct stripe. I do not remember the bets. I do remember winning and winning big – for a kid, then. I began with coins and ended with notes. It was exhilarating. A small crowd gathered around and cheered me on. People love a winner. Would you like to know the secret of my success? The trick is to choose the best game and strategy out of the many available. Consider national lotteries. Do they enable people to pass poverty by or do they pass poverty on? It is not enough to point out that they create millionaires and give to charity. To know what is going on, one has to see the big picture and for that one has to do the numbers. Bad games Consider the slot machine or so-called one-arm-bandit with its spinning wheels. Whether this is a good game or not turns on what is known as the “expected value. ” It is a very important concept in gaming. Think of it as the long run average (Endnote 1). A game in which your total winnings equal your total losses has an expected value of zero and is called “a fair game. ” Bandits are designed to give an average expected value of something less than 0. In the long run, players as a group will always lose. Casinos do actually want some to win – but only in the short term. Winning or seeing others win means you will come back to lose in the long term. Long can be really long. I have written a freeware computer simulator to speed things up. It is called The Freudian Slot Machine (see the accompanying screenshot) and is available on my website (www. mikelanderson. com). Instead of pressing a button countless times, just one key press gets the computer to do thousands of bets per minute. You can watch your pile of money oscillate smaller and bigger and smaller and smaller and then vanish completely. It takes a few minutes to lose 1000 simulated bucks. To lose this amount of real bucks at a casino would take five or more hours of non-stop play (Endnote 2). The one-arm-bandit is a bad game. It is a supremely effective way to waste time and money – for the gambler. For the casino, the slot machine is a supremely effective way to get money. A Las Vegas casino owner candidly put it this way, “When we put 50 machines in, I consider them 50 more mousetraps . You have to have a mousetrap to catch a mouse”(Endnote 3). Another Las Vegas owner said, “If you wanna make money in a casino, own one” (Endnote 4). Billionaire and owner of several casinos, Donald Trump, who knows a thing or two about making money, said, “Frankly, the idea of risking hard-earned money on the toss of the dice or the spin of the wheel seems slightly ludicrous to me personally” (Endnote 5). Why don’t casinos design quick slot machines like my simulator? Human psychology. We remember the occasional win far better than innumerable losses (Endnote 6). They distribute the pain over time and we feel it less acutely. The trouble with slot machines is that the losses are not “human-sized. ” Unlike a gun-toting bandit, the peril of the one-armed variety takes time and casinos go to a lot of trouble to sugarcoat the peril. Hurrah’s casinos track player’s losses and before they reach the predicted point at which the players will not return for more, a “luck ambassador” is sent to steer the players towards a pleasant diversion (Endnote 7). My simulator, in contrast, gives a quick whammy of reality. You only need to play it a couple of times to be put off slots machines for life. Perhaps there is a better game out there? Is the national lottery better or worse? Imagine a lottery that sells only four tickets at one buck each. The person with the winning ticket gets two bucks (the payoff). In this case there is a 0. 25 probability of winning 2 bucks. On average a person can expected to receive (0. 25 X 4) = 50c for every buck spent. The expected value is -50. This imaginary lottery is a waste of time and money. In real lotteries, you get the same bad expected value ((Endnote 8). Real lotteries are also a waste of time and money. In fact, as bad as one-arm-bandits are, they have a far better expected value than state lotteries. People go for lotteries because all the attention (especially by advertisers) is focused on the payoff while nothing is said about the expected value. Indeed advertisers will encourage you to buy two tickets to double your chance of winning. How many appreciate that the poor expected value remains exactly the same? Lotteries are big on hype and small on mathematical explanation. Professor of mathematics, Ian Stewart, says that the lottery “is a tribute to public innumeracy”(Endnote 9). A person playing Lotto every week can only expect to win the jackpot about once every quarter of a million years. The expected value is so low because the chance of winning is so low. For the South African National lottery the probability of winning the jackpot is about 1 in 14 million (Endnote 10). According to the National Safety Council, an American getting killed by lightening in a given year is more likely (about 1 chance in 6 million) (Endnote 11). If this is so, I hear someone ask, why do we hear so many reports about lottery winners and so few about lightning victims? Human psychology again. The former is of so much more interest to people than the latter(Endnote 12). You do not have to wait a quarter of a million years to see the big picture. Download my freeware lottery simulator called Lotto Nonsense? In just a minute you can see the effect on your pocket of playing the lotto for ten years. It enables you to compare spending your money on a lotto ticket or putting it into an interest-bearing savings account instead. I have written another freeware lottery simulator called Lotto Loot? that tracks the effect of a lottery on a community. In this simulation you can manipulate many variables such as the propensity of people to play the lotto, the expected value, the number of balls and the size of the community. It demonstrates that Lotto players get poorer compared to those that save despite the occasional winners and despite being the recipients of the charity raised by the very lottery they played! Unless they make a mistake, whatever the game of chance, the house or the bookmaker has the advantage over the player. This is why it has been said that, “A racehorse is an animal that can take several thousand people for a ride at the same time. ” This is why journalist Jeffrey Bernard said, “In most betting shops you will see three windows marked “Bet Here,” but only one window with the legend “Pay Out”” (Endnote 13). And it is why Jack Yelton said, “There is a very easy way to return from a casino with a small fortune: go there with a large one. ” The worst game From a Christian point of view, examining the payoff and the expected value is far too narrow. There are other more important things to consider. Take freedom for instance. Would winning a game give one more freedom? Dolores Macnamara won 77 million pounds on the Euromillions lottery. Death threats and kidnap plots have forced her and her children into hiding. All her children have been fitted with a personal alarm (Endnote 14). Or consider being rich towards God. The trouble with winning the lottery is that many people have to lose money they need for you to win money you do not. And it is the very poorest that lose the highest proportion of their income. The National Prevalence study of gambling and problem gambling in South Africa for 2006 found that lowest income regular lottery players spent 7 percent of their income on the lottery compared to 1 percent for high-income regular lottery players (Endnote 15). When governments promote both the Lotto and numeracy one has to ask whether they are innumerate themselves or simply wicked. God takes a very dim view of those that exploit the weak. “Do not exploit the poor because they are poor and do not crush the needy in court, for the LORD will take up their case and will plunder those who plunder them” (Endnote 16). States are culpable before God for making losers out of their citizens through national lotteries. They may improve their coffers, but will lose far more. Perhaps they will inherit a bigger crime problem. One study found that pathological gamblers are three times more likely to have been incarcerated than non-gamblers (Endnote 17). Another compared crime rates in United States counties with and without casinos. The former showed dramatic increases in aggravated assaults, rapes, robberies and other crimes (Endnote 18). Or perhaps they will inherit more suicidal citizens. Reviewers of the evidence found that between 13% and 20% of pathological gamblers have attempted suicide (Endnote 19). Just a minute I hear someone say. Scripture says, “The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the LORD” (Endnote 20). And did not the disciples of Jesus cast lots? (Endnote 21). What if I prayed before I gambled? It is true that God is sovereign in all things including the goings on in casinos. It is also true that the ancients gambled. But God never instructs us to follow this example. To pray to win the lottery is to pray that others will lose. “Dear Lord, help me to break even. I need the money” would be a better prayer. But the best prayer is, “Lord enable me to spend my money wisely. ” From a Christian point of view, exploiting the weak is the worst possible game because not even death lets you off the hook. “Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment. . . . ” (Endnote 22). The worst game to play is to let others lose money so that you can win. At best you end up rich towards men and poor towards God. Why do we play bad games? Biologists suspect that our propensity to gamble may be because has some adaptive value in a variable, natural environment (Endnote 23). Taking risks opens up new environments and new resources. The trouble is that propensities that are useful in a natural environment can be maladaptive in an artificial one. Being attracted to light works for moths on moonlit nights, but became suicidal after the invention of the candle. Humans are attracted to slot machines like moths to a flame and casino owners are taking advantage of it. Don’t get down on yourself if you have struggled with gambling. Instead, confess to God what needs to be confessed. Remember that Jesus died so that all your sins could be forgiven. Try to understand what it going on and look for a better game that rises above mere primal urges. A better game – how to never lose The reason for my little bit of success at gambling has little to do with skill or luck. It has to do with my having negligible opportunity to gamble in my formative years and early adulthood. I won because I did not gamble long enough to lose. An even better strategy is not to start. Since casinos and state lotteries do not provide a fair game, the claim that “winners know when to stop” and “you cannot win if you do not play” is more than misleading. It is a lotto nonsense. The wise motto is, “you cannot lose if you do not play”. The way to stop losing is to stop playing. There is a much better game out there. The best game From a Christian point of view the best game is to lose so that others can win. Jesus Christ lost His life so that we could win ours. His example reveals a deep and inspiring truth. To live for God and others is to really live. As He said, “Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it” (Endnote 24). You could do far worse than lose money from gambling – you could forfeit your soul. The trouble with gambling is that it denies the gospel. It focuses attention on self at the expense of others and for the here and now. How parochial are gambling diversions next to the grandeur of the gospel with its focus on God and others. Forget that piddly game called poker. How about joining a game that began in eternity? “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith–and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God– not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do” (Endnote 25). Now that is a big game indeed! Wait just a minute. If losing for others is such a good game, I should buy Lotto tickets because the National Lottery gives to good causes. By this argument, I should support tobacco companies because they give to charity. It is being softhearted and softheaded at the same time. One question to ask of a cause is whether and by how much the good outweighs the bad. It was in the context of giving (of oneself) that Jesus said, “Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves” (Endnote 26). It is best to play the best game strategically. Let us apply this criterion to the Lotto. According to the National Lotteries Board website, for the current seven year license an average of only 30 percent of lottery ticket sales will be contributed to good causes (Endnote 27). This is not a very efficient way of giving. Furthermore, you will have given up your freedom to decide exactly on the causes to which to give. And you may not agree with what the National Lottery Distribution Trust Fund considers the best causes. It gives a greater percentage to sport and recreation than it does to reconstruction and development. In 2007 it gave more than one and half million rand to the Castle Military Museum (Endnote 28). And through the jackpot you would be helping to give the few more money than they really need. Does this match your priorities? The National Lottery is not the best way to win money or to give it away. But, I hear someone say, you have made gambling look like school homework whereas it is meant to be entertainment. It is about the thrill of the risk and the unexpected reward. Indeed, research has revealed that people engage in risky behaviour such as gambling to escape boredom (Endnote 29). The researchers suggest a better way of pursuing excitement – find something to live for. It works. I recall hearing about a novel social programme. They took felons and trained them in dangerous search and rescue operations. Instead of the excitement of a bank robbery, there was the excitement of rescuing people from a precipitous cliff. A former robber explained that he gets a better adrenalin rush now that he is helping people. Gambling short-changes people. It is big on promise, but small on delivery. It is unlikely, but at best there is only a monetary reward that is left behind when we enter eternity. Many people do not see the big picture. They are like the soldiers who crucified Jesus – looking down at the lots they cast for His clothes instead of up at Him dying for them (Endnote 30). A far greater thing was happening than their little game. If you see the big picture, how about helping another that does not? How about persuading someone to serve Jesus rather than a slot machine? Explain that ultimately, gambling ruins whereas God restores lives. Jesus said, “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full ” (Endnote 31). Because it involves souls, serving Jesus is far bigger than the national lottery. Decisions taken for Him affect heaven and earth for now and eternity. ——————————————————- (c) Mike L Anderson – PhD Philosophy of Evolutionary Biology (Wits University). Mike develops educational resources and software and plays Starcraft. Website: => Click here (wwww. mikelanderson. com) for freeware and articles Notes 1. Bluman, A. G. (2005) Probability Demystified. McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 83. Formally, the expected value is the sum of the product of probabilities of the outcomes and the value of the outcomes. Ashline, G. & J. Ellis-Monaghan (2004) The lottery: A dream come true or a tax on people who are bad at math? Primus XIV (4): 303-314. 2. This is with an expected value of -14. With a better expected value it would just take longer – assuming a negative expected value. 3. http://ffbookmarks. com/ betting_ quotes. htm 4. http://www. iht. com/articles/2000/11/ 18/booksam. 2. t. php 5. Quoted in Goldberg, M. H. (1994) The complete book of greed. William Morrow * Co. , New York, p. 224. 6. Committee on the Social and Economic Impact of Pathological Gambling (1999) Pathological Gambling: A Critical Review National Academy Press, Washington, D. C. , p. 244. 7. Ayres, I. (2007) Super Crunchers: How anything can be predicted. John Murray Publishers, London, pp. 30-31. 8. http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Lottery 9. Stewart, I. (1996) It Probably Won’t Be You,” Times Higher Education Supplement, April 12. 10. The probability of winning the 6 pick lottery can be calculated from the formula for combinations (nCr = n!/r!(n-r)!). With n=49 and r=6, nCr = 13,983,816. 11. http://www. nsc. org/research/odds. aspx 12. http://www. dartmouth. edu/~chance/ chance_news/recent_news/chance_news_12. 03. html#item7 13. Quoted in Viner, B. (2008) The set of odds that all gamblers ignore. The Independent http://www. independent. co. uk/opinion/columnists/brian-viner/brian-viner-the-set-of-odds-that-all-gamblers-ignore-782516. html 14. http://www. mirror. co. uk/news/ tm_objectid=16592986&method=full&siteid=94762&headline=lotto-millions-exclusive–the–77million-curse-name_page. html 15. The lowest income group earned less than R800/month. The highest income group earned more than R12000/month. http://www. responsiblegambling. co. za/media/user/documents/NRGP Prevalence Study 2006. pdf 16. Proverbs 22:22-23. 17. Grinols, E. L. (2000) Casino gambling causes crime. Policy Forum 13(2)1-4. 18. Grinols, E. L. & D. B. (2001) Mustard Measuring industry externalities: The curious case of casinos and crime. http://www. ncalg. org/Library/Studies and White Papers/Crime and Corruption/casinos_and_crime_grinols_mustard. pdf 19. Petry, N. M. , and C. Armentano (1999): Prevalence, assessment, and treatment of pathological gambling: a review. Psychiatric Services 50:1021-1027. 20. Proverbs 16:33. 21. Acts 1:26. 22. Hebrews 9:27. 23. McCoy, A. N. , and Platt, M. L. (2005). Risk-sensitive neurons in macaque posterior cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience 8: 1220-1227. 24. Matthew 10:39. 25. Ephesians 2:8-9. 26. Matthew 10:16. 27. http://www. nlb. org. za/nldtf. asp 28. http://www. nlb. org. za/upload/ AnnualReports/Annual Report 2007 . pdf 29. Gosline, A. (December 2007/January 2008). Bored? Scientific American Mind, 18(6), 20-27. 30. John 19:23-24. 31. John 10:10.

(c) Mike L Anderson – PhD Philosophy of Evolutionary Biology (Wits University). Mike develops educational resources and software and plays Starcraft.

Website: http://www. mikelanderson. com